# AI Won’t Save Your Thinking (Q&A)

**URL:** <https://forum.zurb.com/t/ai-won-t-save-your-thinking-q-a/651>\
**Category:** Using AI\
**Created:** [February 18, 2026, 4:04pm UTC](https://forum.zurb.com/t/ai-won-t-save-your-thinking-q-a/651 "2026-02-18T16:04:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forum.zurb.com/bryan/32/448_2.png) [@Bryan](https://forum.zurb.com/u/Bryan)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2026, 7:59pm UTC](https://forum.zurb.com/t/ai-won-t-save-your-thinking-q-a/651/23 "2026-07-01T19:59:43Z")

</div>

Here’s a related Q&A with @jon_daiello, who dives into AI as a thinking tool. CC/ @chris_becker

> [@Mayday, do we have a design thinking problem?](https://forum.zurb.com/t/mayday-do-we-have-a-design-thinking-problem/742):
>
> Excited today to be diving into [jon\_daiello](https://forum.zurb.com/admin/users/251/jon_daiello)’s article, [Language Isn’t Thinking](https://www.jondaiello.com/posts/language-isnt-thinking). Jon explores a challenge many of us are running into with AI. Language has become incredibly cheap to produce, but fluent words are no longer reliable evidence that real thinking happened. His main argument is that language is an expression of thinking, not thinking itself. AI can generate polished documents, prototypes, code, and presentations that look like careful reasoning, but polish doesn’t guarantee anyone w…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.zurb.com/t/ai-won-t-save-your-thinking-q-a/651)._