Too much execution without direction → they burn energy without impact.
Too much strategy without motion → they overthink and stall
I ** think** the sweet spot is where strategy fuels execution, and execution refines strategy. Sometimes you need to act your way into clarity, not think your way into it.
How do you find balance between learning by doing and planning ahead?
I think it’s all about awareness of when you’re off balance. Like everything, it will be a spectrum, so you will never be balanced for long. Recognizing when you’re too far off balance and why is a constant struggle.
I think the interesting thing about this is that AI will either help you or hurt you even more if you replace your thinking with AI from the start. It’s a bit of a trap. Somewhere, you will pay a tax down the line.
Love this! @Bryan I think we see a lot of people and teams struggle with this balancing act. I agree on the AI side, it definitely amplifies whatever foundation you start with. If the strategy is fuzzy, you feel that pain later.
I think your illustration paints the picture of being present with the ideas but also acting to not stall - coming up for air and then seeing how things have evolved. Especially if you can nail these down in short cycles.
Another cool thing about AI is that it helps you “be.” I create rubrics for all kinds of things, which helps me get feedback from a very specific perspective.
For example, a rubric written in a strong brand voice helps you think like a real branding expert, using it for anything you create. If you want to sharpen how you lead, you can take any zoom video and ask for feedback as if you were Churchill, Gandhi, Steve Jobs, or anyone else you admire.
The key is that you are not asking AI to think for you. You are using it to shape how you think.
If your goal is to learn, AI is incredible. You still have to do the hard work, but the depth and speed of the feedback can be amazing.